They agreed that improved relations between Government and the media are critical to the achievement of South Africa envisaged in the country's Constitution.
According to at statement from SANEF, Government and SANEF affirmed one another's role, recognising that a vibrant, diverse and critical media sector was as important to the country's Constitutional democracy as a Government elected with a clear mandate.
SANEF expressed concerns about developments it views as threatening media freedom in the country and as shifting Government towards secrecy, and pointed to what it sees as shortcomings in the communications practice and culture within Government.
Government raised its concern that it was at times vilified and untreated unfairly by media, and that it was held solely responsible for the entrenchment of democracy, in ways that did not apply to other sectors of society.
Government also raised issues around the diversity of media ownership, the quality and integrity of reporting, redress for individuals or institutions affected by inaccurate or salacious reporting, and the need for the dissemination of information in ways that would support help the country realise the vision contained in the Constitution.
The meeting agreed that:
In closing the meeting, the deputy president (who chaired the meeting) urged Government and the media to strive for excellence. Challenges should be addressed with the understanding that SA is a fledgling democracy in its formative stages.
The deputy president called for annual meetings between members of Cabinet and senior editorial executives and said continuous engagement will eliminate irritants in the relationship between the two institutions. He said the starting point for relations should be the Constitution, which was transformative, and enjoined all South Africans in all formations or sectors of society to attend to the challenges that had accumulated from the country's past.
For more:
