Why global fuel prices hit South Africa hard

Source: Unsplash

Secondly, as oil is primarily bought with US dollars, the value of the rand against the dollar plays a further (in our case) negative role in resulting in more expensive fuel at the pump.

Unfortunately, most petroleum products (crude oil and refined petroleum products) consumed in South Africa are imported, and this directly results in the domestic fuel cost either rising or falling.

The March increase was primarily caused by the increasing global oil prices, geopolitical concerns, and the growing instability in the global supply of energy networks. The political turmoil in major oil-producing countries has now caused increased volatility in the market, which has led to worries about possible interruptions to the major distribution and transportation routes.

Oil markets typically react quickly to geopolitical risks, pushing crude prices higher and driving up the cost of refined fuel products downstream. For an economy like South Africa that imports oil, the outcome is often inevitable: higher domestic energy prices.

The ripple effect across the economy

Unfortunately, the fuel price increase does not end with the consumer at the pump. Once fuel prices increase, the cost of moving goods from agricultural/mining/production sites to manufacturing/processing/distribution centres and finally to retailers is exposed to these input price increases.

Road freight logistics plays a crucial role in the long-distance moving of goods among ports, factories, warehouses, and retail locations. These will all feel the effect of the increases.

Companies need to remain financially viable, and thus, transport companies must choose whether to increase their rates (by a variety of factors, such as either a full fuel price increase or a percentage thereof) or whether they have the financial reserves to withstand the increases.

The latter will place pressure on cash flow and reserves. Rate adjustments are often inevitable due to the recurring fuel price strain, even if some transport operators may temporarily withstand the cost to preserve contracts and relationships with clients.

Navigating the future

The fuel price increase in March illustrates how vulnerable the country’s transport sector is to international energy trends, with some really frightening figures being bandied about for April – should the current trajectory of increases and Rand weakness continue.

South Africa should focus on the following key questions:

1. Why can we not produce enough of our own (synthetic) fuels?

   • We created Sasol decades ago to produce fuel to meet the energy needs of the country. What has happened to this capability?
   • We are a coal-rich country – so supply of raw material is not the question (and it is cheap for us).
   • What happened to Union Spirits (an ethanol fuel programme we had during World War II)?
   • We have the capacity to grow sugar cane (the chief ingredient) and other crops to supply this industry. This would save Tongaat-Hulett and the industry at large and create massive employment opportunities, investment opportunities, etc.

2. Where are we with alternative fuel/energy resources?

   • Battery-driven vehicles have been around for some time (yes, still in the technology infancy phase). Why have we not consciously and purposefully driven a move to this? Again, infrastructure development would create massive employment and investment opportunities.
   • Many manufacturers and mines, warehouses and related distribution centres, commercial and retail businesses have moved to solar. Why is this not encouraged - rather than opposed - by Eskom?
   • There is so much scope in the South African context for us to become energy (fuel) self-sufficient….
   • Hydrogen and related technology have also been scarcely looked at.

3. The fuel levy – how can it help?

   • Against the backdrop of the scaling fuel price increase, the levy seems small. However, how about freezing increases for a while?
   • What is the long-term plan to ensure that the fuel levy remains a sustainable and viable investment into the country (if not all spent on roads, which is not the case) shouldn’t it be spent on developing the ability to be energy (fuel) self-sufficient?

One must remember that the fuel levy is seen by Treasury as general income into the fiscus – and it is a rather large one. It has not been “ringfenced” for road users’ requirements (one can argue that those who buy fuel and pay the levy require well-maintained roads). Those who buy fuel (especially diesel) and use it for farming or shipping are able to claim the fuel levy back via Sars.

At the onset of the Ukraine war in 2022, there was a hot debate about reviewing the Basic Fuel Price methodology, which had the (then) Department of Mineral Resources and Energy (DMRE) and Treasury announcing a temporary R1.50 reduction in the general fuel levy. More importantly, there was a proposal for reviewing the Regulatory Accounting System (Rac).

To the best of the knowledge of the association, the Rac was not reviewed, and perhaps it is time to review this together with the questions posed by the association.

It is important to consider that the fuel levy is termed a “general fuel levy” and that this implies that portions of the generated funds through the levy are applied to various aspects of the fiscus. Thus, any relaxation in the level (amount) of the levy would have a material effect on the funding requirements of the Treasury.

South Africa certainly cannot continue to remain vulnerable to international fuel prices when it has both the means and the ability to fairly quickly and reasonably affordably, build the infrastructure to secure its own energy (fuel) needs.