
Leading into nostalgia, a communication signalThe start of 2026 has brought an unexpectedly loud soundtrack of the year 2016. If you’ve been on social media across platforms, you’ve seen people turning back the clock with a common refrain that life in 2016 felt simpler. With all the mainstream coverage of the “is it 2026 or 2016?” moment, it’s hard to dismiss this as a niche trend. ![]() PR Powerhouse’s Lebo Madiba says the start of 2026 has brought an unexpectedly loud soundtrack of the year 2016. What makes it interesting is what it reveals about the present (Image supplied) What makes it interesting is what it reveals about the present. We have more access to human knowledge and achievement than any generation before us. We can pull up history, science, art, faith, and philosophy in seconds. It makes answers accessible, and life feels easier in theory, but the hard part is living inside it. Our daily feeds don’t just inform us; they flood us, speeding up emotions, shortening patience, and making trust harder to hold on to. That’s why the tone of public conversation often feels thin-skinned, quick to react, slow to settle. Rarely about the pastNostalgia is rarely about the past. It’s often a response to the emotional cost of the present. It can be seen in human behaviour, the rising conversation about burnout and overwhelm, the popularity of “soft life” language, the spike in throwback content, and the broader drift towards disengagement from hard news. Even after a good #KeDezember, the world doesn’t reboot with us. The intensity is waiting for us the moment we open our phones again, economic pressure, political whiplash, and the sense that every week brings a new “once-in-a-lifetime” headline. That intensity is both cultural and structural. Even in boardrooms, planning cycles now sit inside a world that feels more contested and less stable. The World Economic Forum’s annual meeting is underway in Davos (19–23 January 2026) under the theme “A Spirit of Dialogue”, a theme that reads less like a grand vision and more like a plea for basic cohesion. French President Emmanuel Macron put it bluntly this week, warning of a shift towards “a world without rules”, where power politics and “imperial ambitions” are resurfacing. So what does all of this mean for business, especially for corporate affairs and corporate communications teams trying to plan without becoming doom-and-gloom merchants? What is means
The next competitive advantageThe next competitive advantage comes from designing organisations that can survive scrutiny and still be understood. Corporate communications For corporate communication, the shift is from messaging to strategy, with communication at the centre, helping leaders choose actions that can be explained, backed by evidence, and held consistently across stakeholders. It becomes part of how decisions are made, and not an afterthought. Agencies For agencies, the brief gets clearer - reduce confusion, reduce risk, increase credibility. That demands rigour, asking the uncomfortable questions early, prioritising what will stand up to scrutiny, and translating complexity into clarity without smoothing over the hard edges. And if 2016 is trending again, the least we can do is bring back clarity. About Lebo MadibaFounder and Managing Director of PR Powerhouse | Communications Strategist | Corporate Reputation Leader | Podcaster at Influence View my profile and articles... |